Richards v. United States

91 F. 516, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2901
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 18, 1899
DocketNo. 2,647
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 F. 516 (Richards v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richards v. United States, 91 F. 516, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2901 (circtsdny 1899).

Opinion

WHEELEB, District Judge.

By paragraph 562 of the act of 1894, periodicals, issued regularly at stated periods, unbound and containing current literature of the day, were free; and, by paragraph 308, lithographic prints, except, among other circumstances, “when forming a part of a periodical or newspaper and accompanying the same,” were dutiable. These articles are lithographic fashion plates, and were returned for duty as lithographic prints. The importers protested that they were “free of duty” under paragraph 308, which states: “Lithographic prints, when forming part of a periodical and accompanying same, shall be excepted from duty.” On hearing before the board without notice, which failed to be given by mistake, the protest was overruled. Testimony taken now shows that these plates were a part of Le Succes, a leading monthly fashion periodical of Paris, furnished five times a year, on the subscription- price of $24 a year,. and accompanying it. The literary part of the periodical consists of notes upon, and a letter concerning, ladies’ current fashions. This seems to be, clearly enough, current literature of the day, to make the periodical free, and the prints seem to so form a part of and to accompany the periodical as to be themselves free. The protest is criticised for stating that the plates were free under paragraph 308, when nothing is specified there as free. But the exception there leaves them free, and the referring to and quoting that seems to point out the ground of the protest sufficiently. Decision reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lynch v. United States
24 Cust. Ct. 4 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)
Adams v. United States ex rel. Palmer
29 F.2d 541 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 F. 516, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-united-states-circtsdny-1899.