Richards v. United States

6 F. App'x 649
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 2001
DocketNo. 99-17255; D.C. No. CV-98-00286-ACM
StatusPublished

This text of 6 F. App'x 649 (Richards v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richards v. United States, 6 F. App'x 649 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Richard L. Richards, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defendant in his Federal Tort Claims Act action alleging negligence by the United States Forest Service. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. See Reed ex rel. Allen v. United States Dep’t of Interior, 231 F.3d 501, 503 (9th Cir.2000). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant because Richards’ injuries were not caused by the breach of any duty owed to him by the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1); Martinez v. Asarco Inc., 918 F.2d 1467, 1470-71 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F. App'x 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-united-states-ca9-2001.