Richards v. United States

74 M.J. 321, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 269
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedMarch 16, 2015
DocketNo. 15-0369/MC
StatusPublished

This text of 74 M.J. 321 (Richards v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richards v. United States, 74 M.J. 321, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 269 (Ark. 2015).

Opinion

On consideration of the writ-appeal petition, Appellee’s motion to substitute the United States for the named Appellees, and Appellant’s motion to expedite the stay of proceedings pending this Court’s resolution of the writ-appeal petition, it is ordered that Appellee’s motion to substitute the United States for the named Appellees is hereby granted, that said writ-appeal petition is hereby denied without prejudice to Appellant’s right to raise the issues asserted during the course of normal appellate review, and Appellant’s motion to expedite the stay of proceedings pending this Court’s resolution of the writ-appeal petition is hereby denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 321, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-united-states-armfor-2015.