Richards v. United States Air Force

Fourth Circuit

Richards v. United States Air Force

474 F. App'x 980

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2012·No. No. 11-1948·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith P. Richards appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richards v. United States Air Force, No. 8:10-cv-01474-RWT (D.Md. July 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith P. Richards appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richards v. United States Air Force, No. 8:10-cv-01474-RWT (D.Md. July 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Richards v. United States Air Force, 474 F. App'x 980 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 980 (Richards v. United States Air Force) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.