Richards v. Texas Co.

245 A.D. 797
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The defendant purchased gasoline equipment which had been used for more than a year, consisting of hose and pumps, and on the day of the purchase leased it to the plaintiff’s employer without making any inspection or examination of the equipment and especially the hose. Nineteen days later, while the plaintiff was filling a car at the street curb, the hose burst, causing the plaintiff to become covered with gasoline, which became ignited from flares maintained by the city in the public street adjacent. The evidence showed that an inspection of the hose would have discovered the defect which caused the accident. Judgments and orders affirmed, with costs in one action. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Texas Co., 245 A.D. 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

245 A.D. 797 (Richards v. Texas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitehead v. Schrick
328 S.W.2d 170 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1959)
Scharf, Admx. v. Gardner Cartage Co.
113 N.E.2d 717 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1953)
La Rocca v. Farrington
93 N.E.2d 829 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
La Rocca v. Farrington
276 A.D.2d 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)