Richards v. Stewart
This text of 2 Day 328 (Richards v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment was affirmed.
After judgment of affirmance had been entered, and execution issued, several members of the Court, some of whom had been in favour of the decision, doubted its correctness; whereupon the Court remanded the execution, and adjourned the case until October, for further argument and consideration The defendant in error then appeared, and moved, that no further proceedings should be had in the case, on the ground, that the judgment which had been rendered was final, and the parties were no longer in court. This motion prevailed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Day 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-stewart-conn-1806.