Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richards v. State

173 So. 2d 157, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4434

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 1965

DocketNo. 64-636

StatusPublished

This text of 173 So. 2d 157 (Richards v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. State, 173 So. 2d 157, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4434 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order summarily denying his petition for relief under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. Ch. 924, Appendix. In denying the petition the trial judge found and recited “that movant was represented by counsel of his own choosing in this cause. That the files and records of this court show conclusively that the petitioner is not entitled to relief which he seeks, and it is therefore * * * denied.”

We have examined the several grounds set forth in the petition in the light of the record and briefs and are of the opinion that no error was committed in denying the petition. See Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order summarily denying his petition for relief under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. Ch. 924, Appendix. In denying the petition the trial judge found and recited “that movant was represented by counsel of his own choosing in this cause. That the files and records of this court show conclusively that the petitioner is not entitled to relief which he seeks, and it is therefore * * * denied.”

We have examined the several grounds set forth in the petition in the light of the record and briefs and are of the opinion that no error was committed in denying the petition. See Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 So. 2d 157, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack