Richards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richards v. State

173 So. 2d 157, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4434

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 1965·No. No. 64-636·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order summarily denying his petition for relief under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. Ch. 924, Appendix. In denying the petition the trial judge found and recited “that movant was represented by counsel of his own choosing in this cause. That the files and records of this court show conclusively that the petitioner is not entitled to relief which he seeks, and it is therefore * * * denied.”

We have examined the several grounds set forth in the petition in the light of the record and briefs and are of the opinion that no error was committed in denying the petition. See Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order summarily denying his petition for relief under Criminal Rule 1, F.S.A. Ch. 924, Appendix. In denying the petition the trial judge found and recited “that movant was represented by counsel of his own choosing in this cause. That the files and records of this court show conclusively that the petitioner is not entitled to relief which he seeks, and it is therefore * * * denied.”

We have examined the several grounds set forth in the petition in the light of the record and briefs and are of the opinion that no error was committed in denying the petition. See Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57.

Affirmed.

Richards v. State, 173 So. 2d 157, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4434 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

173 So. 2d 157 (Richards v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related