Richards v. Smith
This text of 75 Mass. 315 (Richards v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An appeal lies from the court of common pleas, only for error in law apparent on the face of the record. St. 1840, c. 87, § 4. And this record does not state facts enough to show either the claimant’s right to the fund, or the trustee’s right to be discharged. • We must presume that evidence was not given to the court of common pleas, which proved the validity of.the assignment to the claimant; or that other evidence was given, which showed that the assignment was invalid.
In the case of Taylor v. Collins, 5 Gray, 50, note, the trustee’s answer disclosed a valid assignment for good consideration ; the court of common .pleas defaulted the claimant, but discharged the trustee; the plaintiff, by his appeal, opened the whole case in this court; and this court necessarily discharged the trustee.
Trustee charged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 Mass. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-smith-mass-1857.