Richards v. Saunders

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 28, 2004
• Docket: 03-7774
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7774

MARK E. RICHARDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY W. SAUNDERS, Warden; ANTHONY PARKER; KIMBERLY ORDILE, Operations Officer; JANE MENEFEE, Mailroom Officer; FOUR UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS, Coffeewood Correctional Center; FOUR UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS, The Virginia Department of Corrections; RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; BARRY MEADOR, Coffeewood Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-805-7)

Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark E. Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Mark E. Richards appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his

civil rights complaint challenging the conditions of confinement.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Richards v. Saunders, No. CA-01-805-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 2,

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -