Richards v. Saunders

86 F. App'x 570
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2004·No. No. 03-7774·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark E. Richards appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his civil rights complaint challenging the conditions of confinement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richards v. Saunders, No. CA-01-805-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Saunders, 86 F. App'x 570 (4th Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 570 (Richards v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preldakaj v. Keisler
252 F. App'x 79 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)