Richards v. Rumsfeld

Fourth Circuit

Richards v. Rumsfeld

85 F. App'x 330

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 14, 2004·No. No. 03-1395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn M. Richards appeals from the district court’s order entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on her employment discrimination action alleging a hostile work environment and retaliation. We have reviewed the record, including the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richards v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-02-1114-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003; entered Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn M. Richards appeals from the district court’s order entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on her employment discrimination action alleging a hostile work environment and retaliation. We have reviewed the record, including the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richards v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-02-1114-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003; entered Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Richards v. Rumsfeld, 85 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

85 F. App'x 330 (Richards v. Rumsfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.