Richards v. Mullryne
This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 540 (Richards v. Mullryne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Parsons Sollicitor for the Defendants, moved that the Complainant’s Bill of Complaint in this Cause might be dismissed alledging that he had obtained a Certificate from the Register that the Complainant’s had not replied to some of the Defendants Answers The Court on hearing Counsel on Behalf of the Said Complainants who alledged that the Complainants had filed their Replication this Morning it is Ordered that the Bill for the present be retained and that the Complainants Speed their Cause.
On Reading the Petition of Mr. Bennet Oldham 73 praying to be [admitted a Solicitor in this Court] and upon his having taken tire usual Oath of a Sollicitor It is [Ordered that the said] Petitioner be admitted to act, and that his Name be entred as such [amongst the] Acts of this Court.
[Bracketed words above and below are torn from manuscript and supplied from Register’s draft book]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-mullryne-ctchansc-1764.