Richards v. Montgomery

Alabama Court of Appeals

Richards v. Montgomery

150 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 671

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 31, 1933

Docket6 Div. 460.

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 926 (Richards v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. Montgomery, 150 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

This is an action in detinue against the superintendent of banks for the recovery of a certain stock certificate No. 9o, in the Wood-lawn Building & Loan Association. On the trial, judgment was rendered for plaintiff for the property sued for. Motion for new trial made by defendant was granted, duly excepted to by plaintiff, and, from the granting of the motion, appeal is taken by authority of section 6088, Code 1923.

Among the grounds set out in the motion is: “The judgment was contrary to the evidence.”

The trial was had by the judge sitting without a jury. The evidence was taken ore ten-us. He had the witnesses before him. The evidence was in conflict, and, giving to the findings of the judge those presumptions to which they are entitled, the judgment must be affirmed. Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, 9 So. 738.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI