Richards v. Mena

820 S.W.2d 372, 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 238, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 150, 1991 WL 259792
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 1991·No. D-1549·Published·Cited by 30 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This cause is a direct appeal of a temporary injunction issued because the district court held the statutory redistricting for the Texas House of Representative was contrary to provisions of the Texas Constitution. The district court has now rendered a final judgment in the permanent injunction sought in this cause. Consideration of the temporary injunction is therefore moot. Coalition of Cities for Affordalbe Utility Rates v. Third Court of Appeals, 787 S.W.2d 946, 947 (Tex.1990). We therefore dismiss this appeal as moot. The dismissal is of this appeal of the temporary injunction order only, and is without prejudice to the appeal, if any, of the final judgment granting or denying any permanent injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Mena, 820 S.W.2d 372, 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 238, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 150, 1991 WL 259792 (Tex. 1991).

820 S.W.2d 372 (Richards v. Mena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Texas v. Harris County, Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2025
WCJ Assets, Ltd. v. US Trinity Bridgeport, LLC
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
Hernandez v. Ebrom
289 S.W.3d 316 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)
Michael Lou Garrett v. Mario A. Del Fierro
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
Jerry Henry v. Flintrock Feeders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
Lincoln Property Co. v. Kondos
110 S.W.3d 712 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)