Richards v. Little

14 S.E. 207, 88 Ga. 176, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 319
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 28, 1891·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Certiorari. Practice. Before Judge McWhorter. Taliaferro superior court. February term, 1891. J. W. Hixon, by J. H. Lumpion, for plaintiff in error. Horace M. Holden, contra.

Mrs. Little sued Richards iu a justice’s court, and obtained a verdict. Richards carried the case to the superior court by certiorari, but it does not appear what error was assigned in' his petition therefor. The evidence at the trial before the jury iu the justice’s court appeared; aud it was further stated iu the petitiou for certiorari that certain rulings were made by the justice. As to these rulings the justice stated in his answer that the petition was incorrect; and Richards traversed this part of the answer. The superior court dismissed the certiorari, and struck the traverse; and to these rulings Richards excepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Little, 14 S.E. 207, 88 Ga. 176, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 319 (Ga. 1891).

14 S.E. 207 (Richards v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deep v. Devane
175 S.E. 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Gaines v. Continental Aid Ass'n
95 S.E. 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)