Richards v. Kaskel
569 N.E.2d 872, 77 N.Y.2d 856, 568 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 143
Opinion
Motion, treated as a motion to amend remittitur, dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]; Drzewinski v Atlantic Scaffold & Ladder Co., 70 AD2d 999). [See, 32 NY2d 524.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richards v. Kaskel, 569 N.E.2d 872, 77 N.Y.2d 856, 568 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 143 (N.Y. 1991).
569 N.E.2d 872 (Richards v. Kaskel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richards v. Estate of Kaskel
169 A.D.2d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)