Richards v. Kaskel
569 N.E.2d 872, 77 N.Y.2d 856, 568 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 143
This text of 569 N.E.2d 872 (Richards v. Kaskel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Richards v. Kaskel, 569 N.E.2d 872, 77 N.Y.2d 856, 568 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 143 (N.Y. 1991).
Opinion
Motion, treated as a motion to amend remittitur, dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]; Drzewinski v Atlantic Scaffold & Ladder Co., 70 AD2d 999). [See, 32 NY2d 524.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richards v. Estate of Kaskel
169 A.D.2d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
569 N.E.2d 872, 77 N.Y.2d 856, 568 N.Y.S.2d 13, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-kaskel-ny-1991.