Richards v. Kaney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Richards v. Kaney

490 So. 2d 1299, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1422, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8510

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 24, 1986

DocketNo. 86-1043

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 490 So. 2d 1299 (Richards v. Kaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. Kaney, 490 So. 2d 1299, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1422, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8510 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition seeks to disqualify the trial judge in this dissolu[1300-1306]*1300-1306tion of marriage proceeding for alleged prejudice and bias, but fails to allege facts to demonstrate that such prejudice exists. See Rule 1.432(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. The most that can be said for the petition is that it contends that prejudice is demonstrated by adverse pre-trial rulings, which is not a sufficient ground for disqualifying a judge. See Tafero v. State, 403 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1981), rev. denied, 455 U.S. 983, 102 S.Ct. 1492, 71 L.Ed.2d 694 (1982); Claughton v. Claughton, 452 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

PETITION DENIED.

DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition seeks to disqualify the trial judge in this dissolu[1300-1306]*1300-1306tion of marriage proceeding for alleged prejudice and bias, but fails to allege facts to demonstrate that such prejudice exists. See Rule 1.432(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. The most that can be said for the petition is that it contends that prejudice is demonstrated by adverse pre-trial rulings, which is not a sufficient ground for disqualifying a judge. See Tafero v. State, 403 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1981), rev. denied, 455 U.S. 983, 102 S.Ct. 1492, 71 L.Ed.2d 694 (1982); Claughton v. Claughton, 452 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

PETITION DENIED.

DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 So. 2d 1299, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1422, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-kaney-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack