Richards v. Kaney

490 So. 2d 1299, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1422, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8510
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1986·No. No. 86-1043·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition seeks to disqualify the trial judge in this dissolu[1300-1306]*1300-1306tion of marriage proceeding for alleged prejudice and bias, but fails to allege facts to demonstrate that such prejudice exists. See Rule 1.432(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. The most that can be said for the petition is that it contends that prejudice is demonstrated by adverse pre-trial rulings, which is not a sufficient ground for disqualifying a judge. See Tafero v. State, 403 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1981), rev. denied, 455 U.S. 983, 102 S.Ct. 1492, 71 L.Ed.2d 694 (1982); Claughton v. Claughton, 452 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

PETITION DENIED.

DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Kaney, 490 So. 2d 1299, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1422, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8510 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

490 So. 2d 1299 (Richards v. Kaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudloe v. Department of Environmental Regulation
31 Fla. Supp. 2d 159 (State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, 1988)
Deren v. Williams
521 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
23 Fla. Supp. 2d 222 (State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, 1986)