Richards v. Jefferson County

516 U.S. 1167, 116 S. Ct. 1257
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richards v. Jefferson County. Read the opinion of the Court — 517 U.S. 793
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 15, 1996·No. No. 95-386·Published

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Ala. [Certiorari granted, ante, [1168]*1168p. 988.] Writ of certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted to the extent that it includes the question whether the occupational tax challenged by petitioners violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. The parties are directed to address at oral argument only the remaining question: Whether the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits the application of res judicata in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Jefferson County, 516 U.S. 1167, 116 S. Ct. 1257 (1996).

516 U.S. 1167 (Richards v. Jefferson County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.