Richards v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

530 So. 2d 504, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2078, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4015, 1988 WL 91171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richards v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 522 So. 2d 410
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 1988·No. No. 87-2168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant complains of the trial court’s preservation of testimony in a termination of parental rights proceeding. A review of the record in its entirety clearly demonstrates that the trial court was correct in the ultimate order it entered based on the evidence before it, excluding the testimony which was perpetuated, and therefore we find no error in the order under review. At best, under the entire circumstances, the error would be harmless. Pulitzer v. Pulitzer, 449 So.2d 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Greenfield v. Bland, 99 So.2d 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958); Section 59.041 Florida Statutes (1987). Therefore, the order of termination under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 530 So. 2d 504, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2078, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4015, 1988 WL 91171 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

530 So. 2d 504 (Richards v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenfield v. Bland
99 So. 2d 727 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Pulitzer v. Pulitzer
449 So. 2d 370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)