Richards v. Daily News Distributing Corp.

294 A.D.2d 480, 742 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5216
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richards v. Daily News Distributing Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 A.D.2d 479

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Daily News Distributing Corp. and the defendant third-party plaintiff Daily News, LP, appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated March 23, 2001, which, upon the granting of the motion of the third-party defendant for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the third-party complaint, made at the close of the third-party plaintiff’s proof, dismissed the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the appeal by Daily News Distributing Corp. is dismissed, as it is not aggrieved by the judgment appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the third-party defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the third-party defendant at the close of the third-party plaintiff’s proof since, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the third-party plaintiff, accepting all of its evidence as true, and resolving all credibility issues and inferences in its favor, the jury could not have found in its favor by any rational process (see CPLR 4401; Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553; Schriber v Melroe Co., 273 AD2d 650; cf. State Farm Ins. Co. v Amana Refrig., 266 AD2d 372).

The parties’ remaining contentions are either without merit or need not be reached in light of this determination. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Daily News Distributing Corp., 294 A.D.2d 480, 742 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 480 (Richards v. Daily News Distributing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Szczerbiak v. Pilat
686 N.E.2d 1346 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
State Farm Insurance v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.
266 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Schriber v. Melroe Co.
273 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)