Richards v. Commonwealth

42 A.3d 1002, 615 Pa. 329, 2012 WL 1434881, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 980
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 25, 2012·No. 42 EAP 2011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2012, upon agreement of Appellant and the Corrections Appellees that the Commonwealth Court misconstrued the factual allegations of Appellant’s Amended Petition for Review, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration of the preliminary objections.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. Commonwealth, 42 A.3d 1002, 615 Pa. 329, 2012 WL 1434881, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 980 (Pa. 2012).

42 A.3d 1002 (Richards v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Au
42 A.3d 1002 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)