Richards v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Richards v. City of Tulsa

1912 OK CR 239, 120 P. 1130, 7 Okla. Crim. 696, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 43

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1912

DocketNo. A-1405.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 239 (Richards v. City of Tulsa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richards v. City of Tulsa, 1912 OK CR 239, 120 P. 1130, 7 Okla. Crim. 696, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 43 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

*697 PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Tulsa county oh a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the city jail of the City of Tulsa for a period of fifteen days. The appeal was filed in this court on the 27th day of September, 1911. The Attorney General has filed the following motion to dismiss the appeal:

“Because the record shows that this is an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction for a misdemeanor rendered in the county court of Tulsa county on the 21st day of June, 1911, an order having been made on the 20th day of July, 1911, extending the time within which to file the petition in error and case-made in this court, to seventy-five days from said 21st day of June, 1911, and the petition in error and ease-made were not filed in this court until the 27th day of September, 1911, long after said seventy-five days had expired.”

There has been no answer filed to the motion, and no appearance made for plaintiff in error. We take the motion as confessed, and it is sustained. The appeal is dismiseed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*697 PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Tulsa county oh a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the city jail of the City of Tulsa for a period of fifteen days. The appeal was filed in this court on the 27th day of September, 1911. The Attorney General has filed the following motion to dismiss the appeal:

“Because the record shows that this is an attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction for a misdemeanor rendered in the county court of Tulsa county on the 21st day of June, 1911, an order having been made on the 20th day of July, 1911, extending the time within which to file the petition in error and case-made in this court, to seventy-five days from said 21st day of June, 1911, and the petition in error and ease-made were not filed in this court until the 27th day of September, 1911, long after said seventy-five days had expired.”

There has been no answer filed to the motion, and no appearance made for plaintiff in error. We take the motion as confessed, and it is sustained. The appeal is dismiseed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 239, 120 P. 1130, 7 Okla. Crim. 696, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-city-of-tulsa-oklacrimapp-1912.