Richards v. City of Citrus Heights

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 6, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-02159·Unknown

Opinion

Morin I. Jacob, Bar No. 204598 1 mjacob@lcwlegal.com 2 Nathan T. Jackson, Bar No. 285620 njackson@lcwlegal.com 3 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE A Professional Law Corporation 4 135 Main Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 5 Telephone: 415.512.3000 Facsimile: 415.856.0306 6 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, RONALD 7 LAWRENCE, GINA ANDERSON, and CHRISTOPHER BOYD 8 Johnny L. Griffin, III, Bar No. 118694 9 Manolo Olaso, Bar No. 195629 LAW OFFICE OF JOHNNY L. GRIFFIN III 10 1010 F Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95814 11 Telephone: (916) 444-5557 12 Facsimile: (916) 444-5558 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANRA RICHARDS 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO 17 SANDRA RICHARDS, Case No.: 2:20-cv-02159-DAD-JDP

18 Plaintiff, Complaint Filed: October 27, 2020 FAC Filed: October 30, 2020 19 v. SAC Filed: April 5, 2022

20 CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS; STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RONALD LAWRENCE, an individual; 21 GINA ANDERSON, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BOYD, an individual; 22 and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24

25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 26 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 27 1 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 2 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 3 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 4 or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 5 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 6 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that 7 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 8 Judge Drozd’s Standing Order sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that 9 will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 10 2. DEFINITIONS 11 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 12 information or items under this Order. 13 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 14 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 15 Civil Procedure 26(c). 16 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 17 as their support staff). 18 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 19 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 20 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 21 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 22 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 23 discovery in this matter. 24 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 25 litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 26 consultant in this action. 27 1 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel 2 does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 3 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 4 entity not named as a Party to this action. 5 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 6 but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on 7 behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 8 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 9 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 10 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 11 Material in this action. 12 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 13 photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 14 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 15 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 16 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 17 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 18 Producing Party. 19 3. SCOPE 20 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 21 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 22 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 23 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 24 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 25 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 26 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 27 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 1 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 2 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 3 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of 4 Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 5 4. DURATION 6 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 7 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 8 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 9 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 10 and exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the 11 time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 12 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 13 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 14 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 15 limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 16 Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or 17 oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 18 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within 19 the ambit of this Order. 20 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown 21 to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily 22 encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on 23 other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 24 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for 25 protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties 26 that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 27 1 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards v. City of Citrus Heights, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Richards v. City of Citrus Heights (Richards v. City of Citrus Heights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitchess v. Superior Court
522 P.2d 305 (California Supreme Court, 1974)