Richards v. Campbell

30 A.D.3d 427, 815 N.Y.S.2d 486
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 6, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 A.D.3d 427 (Richards v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richards v. Campbell, 30 A.D.3d 427, 815 N.Y.S.2d 486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In a child custody [428]*428proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Goldstein, R), dated October 15, 2004, as, after a hearing, awarded the father custody of the parties’ child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon our review of the forensic evaluations and hearing testimony and considering the recommendation of the Law Guardian, we conclude that the Family Court correctly determined that the best interests of the child would be served by awarding the father custody (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167 [1982]). Florio, J.E, Adams, Luciano and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brass v. Otero
40 A.D.3d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 427, 815 N.Y.S.2d 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-campbell-nyappdiv-2006.