Richards v. Board of Elections

54 A.D.3d 430, 862 N.Y.S.2d 297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 20, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A.D.3d 430 (Richards v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richards v. Board of Elections, 54 A.D.3d 430, 862 N.Y.S.2d 297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Donovan J. Richards, Jr., as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 2008, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the [431]*431public office of Member of the Assembly, 31st Assembly District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), entered August 8, 2008, which, upon granting the oral motion of Eric L. DeBerry to dismiss the petition for failure to establish a prima facie case, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the final order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the oral motion to dismiss the petition is denied, the proceeding is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing forthwith on all of the issues raised in this proceeding, and a determination thereafter.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court erred in failing to consider any of the evidence submitted to it or to address any of the issues raised in this proceeding before making its determination. Therefore, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to consider the evidence and issues, to make appropriate findings of fact, and for a determination thereafter (cf. Hanney v Commissioners of Elections of Westchester County, 59 AD2d 707 [1977]). Skelos, J.P., Lifson, Florio, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olenick v. Carlow
76 A.D.2d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.3d 430, 862 N.Y.S.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-2008.