Richards v. Beach

5 N.Y.S. 574, 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 296, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2527
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedFebruary 4, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.Y.S. 574 (Richards v. Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richards v. Beach, 5 N.Y.S. 574, 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 296, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2527 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court is not restrained by the injunction in the case of Cochran v. American Opera Co.,1 even if the parties to the appeal are. If either of them has violated the injunction by bringing on the argument of the appeal, he is responsible. Since the first argument of this case the court of appeals have decided the matter in controversy in Walton v. Coe, 110 N. Y. 109, 17 N. E. Rep. 676, adversely to the respondent, and the judgment must therefore be reversed. But as this decision was made after the appeal had been taken from the city court, we think the respondent should have liberty to answer over, on payment of the costs of the appeal to this court only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walton v. . Coe
17 N.E. 676 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.Y.S. 574, 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 296, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richards-v-beach-nyctcompl-1889.