Richardo Martinez A/K/A Ricardo Martinez v. Filomena Garcia
This text of Richardo Martinez A/K/A Ricardo Martinez v. Filomena Garcia (Richardo Martinez A/K/A Ricardo Martinez v. Filomena Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued December 17, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00560-CV ——————————— RICHARD MARTINEZ, Appellant V. FILOMENA GARCIA, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1184569
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Richard Martinez, has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
April 22, 2024 final judgment. Appellant has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). The clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on August 16, 2024, and on August
20, 2024, the court reporter informed the Court that no record was taken. Appellant’s
brief was due to be filed on or before September 19, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.6(a).
On September 18, 2024, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file
his brief, which the Court granted, setting October 21, 2024 as the deadline for
appellant to file his brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 38.6(d). Appellant did not
file an appellant’s brief.
On November 5, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this
appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a
brief, was filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing
failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal
for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure
to comply with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was
subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond to the November 5, 2024
notice.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richardo Martinez A/K/A Ricardo Martinez v. Filomena Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richardo-martinez-aka-ricardo-martinez-v-filomena-garcia-texapp-2024.