Richard Zeitvogel v. Michael Bowersox

103 F.3d 56, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32907, 1996 WL 714911
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 10, 1996·No. 96-4133·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Zeitvogel, a Missouri death-row inmate, has applied for a certificate of appealability from the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the earlier denial of his first amended habeas petition. Having carefully reviewed the matter, we conclude the district court properly denied Zeitvogel’s motion. Zeitvogel based his Rule 60(b) motion on the same grounds that we already rejected in denying Zeitvogel’s motion for leave to file a second habeas petition. Zeitvogel v. Bowersox, 103 F.3d 54 (8th Cir.1996). We thus deny Zeitvogel’s application for a certificate of appealability, and his accompanying motion for a stay of execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Zeitvogel v. Michael Bowersox, 103 F.3d 56, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32907, 1996 WL 714911 (8th Cir. 1996).

103 F.3d 56 (Richard Zeitvogel v. Michael Bowersox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Vargas
393 F.3d 172 (District of Columbia, 2004)
United States v. Vargas, Michael
415 F.3d 23 (D.C. Circuit, 2004)
Juanita Pope Reid v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director
369 F.3d 363 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)
Reid v. Angelone
Fourth Circuit, 2004
Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
366 F.3d 1253 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
Paul Kellogg v. Wayne Strack
269 F.3d 100 (Second Circuit, 2001)