Richard Wollenberg v. John Potter
This text of 269 F. App'x 612 (Richard Wollenberg v. John Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard J. Wollenberg, III, appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most favorable to Wollenberg, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 F. App'x 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-wollenberg-v-john-potter-ca8-2008.