Richard Willard Kay v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Richard Willard Kay v. United States

212 F.2d 795, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3445

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1954

Docket12121_1

StatusPublished

This text of 212 F.2d 795 (Richard Willard Kay v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Willard Kay v. United States, 212 F.2d 795, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3445 (6th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and briefs of the parties on an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate sentence, and it appearing that the contentions of appellant, in all essential details, as to what occurred on his trial, are directly refuted by the transcript of the evidence, and that it is conclusively shown, on the record, that appellant was not entitled to the relief sought,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence be and is hereby affirmed. Tatum v. United States, 9 Cir., 204 F.2d 324; Garcia v. United States, 9 Cir., 197 F.2d 687; Morales v. United States, 1 Cir., 187 F.2d 518.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and briefs of the parties on an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate sentence, and it appearing that the contentions of appellant, in all essential details, as to what occurred on his trial, are directly refuted by the transcript of the evidence, and that it is conclusively shown, on the record, that appellant was not entitled to the relief sought,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence be and is hereby affirmed. Tatum v. United States, 9 Cir., 204 F.2d 324; Garcia v. United States, 9 Cir., 197 F.2d 687; Morales v. United States, 1 Cir., 187 F.2d 518.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 F.2d 795, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-willard-kay-v-united-states-ca6-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack