Richard Willard Kay v. United States

212 F.2d 795, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Richard Willard Kay v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 F.2d 442
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 14, 1954·No. 12121_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and briefs of the parties on an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate sentence, and it appearing that the contentions of appellant, in all essential details, as to what occurred on his trial, are directly refuted by the transcript of the evidence, and that it is conclusively shown, on the record, that appellant was not entitled to the relief sought,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence be and is hereby affirmed. Tatum v. United States, 9 Cir., 204 F.2d 324; Garcia v. United States, 9 Cir., 197 F.2d 687; Morales v. United States, 1 Cir., 187 F.2d 518.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Willard Kay v. United States, 212 F.2d 795, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3445 (6th Cir. 1954).

212 F.2d 795 (Richard Willard Kay v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morales v. United States
187 F.2d 518 (First Circuit, 1951)
Garcia v. United States
197 F.2d 687 (Ninth Circuit, 1952)
Tatum v. United States
204 F.2d 324 (Ninth Circuit, 1953)