Richard Weidman v. Exxon Mobil Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1116

RICHARD C. WEIDMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

F. BUD CARR; KENT DIXON; MEGHAN HASSON; CLARION ELLIS JOHNSON; STEPHEN D. JONES; GERARD MONSIVAIZ; JEREMY SAMPSELL; VICTORIA MARTIN WELDON; DANIEL WHITFIELD; JEFFREY WOODBURY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00501-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard C. Weidman, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Michael Bates, HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Richard C. Weidman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to deny

Exxon Mobil’s Bill of Costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weidman v. Exxon

Mobil Corp., No. 1:13-cv-00501-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2020). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED