Richard Vargas v. State
This text of Richard Vargas v. State (Richard Vargas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 26, 2016
No. 04-16-00212-CR
Richard VARGAS, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 20th District Court, Milam County, Texas Trial Court No. CR24573 John Youngblood, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, in part,
If the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2) . . . . The certification should be part of the record when notice [of appeal] is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or supplementation . . . by order of the appellate court under Rule 34.5(c)(2). The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
The record before us, however, does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal. The trial court clerk is therefore ORDERED to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s certification pursuant to Rule 25.2 within 10 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). _________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of May, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Vargas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-vargas-v-state-texapp-2016.