Richard v. Madden and Margaret J. Madden v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

440 F.2d 784, 27 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 761, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11597
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 1971
Docket18277_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 440 F.2d 784 (Richard v. Madden and Margaret J. Madden v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard v. Madden and Margaret J. Madden v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 440 F.2d 784, 27 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 761, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11597 (7th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court. Madden v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 52 T.C. 845 (1969).

While the factual situation here involved is set forth in detail in the Tax Court’s decision, the following is a brief summary thereof.

Madden included in the gross estate in the federal estate tax return of his deceased wife one-half of the value of certain stock owned by them as joint tenants. He subsequently sold the stock and included in his basis the value as reported for federal estate tax purposes.

Madden offered no proof as to source of ownership but contends that under the Internal Revenue Code the burden of proof was on the Commissioner to show the extent to which the stock was not required to be included in the estate tax return.

The Tax Court held that the burden of proof was on the taxpayer to show what, if any, portion of the stock was required to be included in the estate tax return, there was a failure of proof and the basis of the stock for purposes of determining gain or loss on his income tax return was the stock’s cost. We agree.

The Tax Court decision is well reasoned and no purpose will be served by here repeating the analysis of the applicable law or further expanding the basic facts. We adopt and approve the decision of the Tax Court. Madden v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra. Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hahn v. Comm'r
110 T.C. No. 14 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Therese Hahn v. Commissioner
110 T.C. No. 14 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 F.2d 784, 27 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 761, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-v-madden-and-margaret-j-madden-v-commissioner-of-internal-ca7-1971.