Richard v. Hills

Ohio Supreme Court

Richard v. Hills

580 N.E.2d 774, 62 Ohio St. 3d 155, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2790

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1991·No. No. 90-1496·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954, we held that appeal to this court on the question of denial of effective assistance of appellate counsel is an adequate remedy at law, which [156] precludes issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954, we held that appeal to this court on the question of denial of effective assistance of appellate counsel is an adequate remedy at law, which [156] precludes issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Richard v. Hills, 580 N.E.2d 774, 62 Ohio St. 3d 155, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2790 (Ohio 1991).

Pincite

580 N.E.2d 774 (Richard v. Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related