Richard V. Harnett & Co. v. Englander

120 A.D. 351, 105 N.Y.S. 1140, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1174

Opinion

Lambert, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action to recover $1,000, with interest, commissions alleged to have been earned in negotiating an exchange-•of real estate. Upon the trial of the action the jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff,, which, on motion of defendant, was set aside and the plaintiff’s complaint was-'dismissed, on the ground that the plaintiff acted in the premises in. violation of section 640d of' the- Penal Code, and that his right of recovery was thus, defeated. It is conceded that the plaintiff did not have the written authority demanded by the Penal Code, and this court

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard V. Harnett & Co. v. Englander, 120 A.D. 351, 105 N.Y.S. 1140, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

120 A.D. 351 (Richard V. Harnett & Co. v. Englander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frank L. Fisher Co. v. Woods
79 N.E. 836 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Whiteley v. Terry
83 A.D. 197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)