Richard v. Bergeron

40 La. Ann. 717
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1888
DocketNo. 1321
StatusPublished

This text of 40 La. Ann. 717 (Richard v. Bergeron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard v. Bergeron, 40 La. Ann. 717 (La. 1888).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MoEnery, J.

The plaintiff, authorized by her husband, as the forced heir of her father, Theodore Richard, alleges that she is entitled to one-seventh of his succession.

[718]*718She brings this suit to annul the sales of certain property in the town of Arnoudville, made by her father to N. A. Guilbeau, and from Guilbeau to Bergeron, from Bergeron to Louisa Comeux, and from Louisa Comeux to N. A. Guilbeau, because they were simulations. The property was assessed in the name of Guilbeau, and was sold for taxes, and bought by defendant Bergeron.

This tax sale is also attacked.

The district judge dismissed the casé because the plaintiff failed to establish her demand. After a careful examination of the evidence we concur with the district judge, that the evidence wss insufficient to support the allegations in her petition.

The defendants, in their brief, state, “we content ourselves by ask ing for an affirmance of the judgment.”

Judgment affirmed, plaintiffs and appellants to pay cost of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 La. Ann. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-v-bergeron-la-1888.