Richard Townes, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

17 F.3d 1434, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12196, 1994 WL 5110
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 1994
Docket93-6618
StatusPublished

This text of 17 F.3d 1434 (Richard Townes, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richard Townes, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 17 F.3d 1434, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12196, 1994 WL 5110 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

17 F.3d 1434
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard TOWNES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 93-6618.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clark, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-543-2).

Richard Townes, Jr., appellant pro se.

Robert Quentin Harris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Townes v. Murray, No. CA-92-543-2 (E.D. Va. May 12, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Townes's motion to certify a question to the Virginia Supreme Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F.3d 1434, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12196, 1994 WL 5110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-townes-jr-v-edward-w-murray-director-of-th-ca4-1994.