Richard Todd Hawkins v. Franklin Freeman Tom Martin City of Hinton, Oklahoma

Fourth Circuit

Richard Todd Hawkins v. Franklin Freeman Tom Martin City of Hinton, Oklahoma

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4169, 1996 WL 2221

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 1996

Docket95-7680

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Richard Todd Hawkins v. Franklin Freeman Tom Martin City of Hinton, Oklahoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Todd Hawkins v. Franklin Freeman Tom Martin City of Hinton, Oklahoma, 73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4169, 1996 WL 2221 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard Todd HAWKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklin FREEMAN; Tom Martin; City of Hinton, Oklahoma,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7680.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Richard Todd Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hawkins v. Freeman, No. CA-95-649-5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Richard Todd HAWKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklin FREEMAN; Tom Martin; City of Hinton, Oklahoma,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7680.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 28, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Richard Todd Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hawkins v. Freeman, No. CA-95-649-5-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4169, 1996 WL 2221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-todd-hawkins-v-franklin-freeman-tom-martin-ca4-1996.