Richard Terrell v. Kenneth Apfel

Eighth Circuit

Richard Terrell v. Kenneth Apfel

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedAugust 3, 1998

Docket97-4036

StatusUnpublished

This text of Richard Terrell v. Kenneth Apfel (Richard Terrell v. Kenneth Apfel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Terrell v. Kenneth Apfel, (8th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 97-4036 ___________

Richard Allen Terrell, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security, * * Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: July 28, 1998

Filed: August 3, 1998 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Allen Terrell appeals from an order of the district court1 affirming the Commissioner&s decision to stop Terrell&s Social Security Income benefits and order repayment of benefits for which he was ineligible because of his wife&s income. As Terrell has never disputed the amount of income the Social Security Administration (SSA) attributed to his wife, nor has he disputed the calculation of overpayment

1 The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. contained in the SSA&s notices, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge&s determination that Terrell was not eligible for benefits based on his family income and that benefits were overpaid to him. See Connell v. Bowen, 888 F.2d 1250, 1251-52 (8th Cir. 1989) (standard of review). Although Terrell argues that the SSA improperly denied his request for a waiver as to the overpayment, we note that the issue of waiver is not properly before us, as the Appeals Council referred this issue back to the SSA, and Terrell alleged neither exhaustion of his administrative remedies on this issue nor a basis for waiver of the exhaustion requirement. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3); Rodabaugh v. Sullivan, 943 F.2d 855, 857 (8th Cir. 1991) (bases for waiver of exhaustion requirement). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 97-4036 ___________

Richard Allen Terrell, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security, * * Appellee. * ___________

Submitted: July 28, 1998

Filed: August 3, 1998 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Allen Terrell appeals from an order of the district court1 affirming the Commissioner&s decision to stop Terrell&s Social Security Income benefits and order repayment of benefits for which he was ineligible because of his wife&s income. As Terrell has never disputed the amount of income the Social Security Administration (SSA) attributed to his wife, nor has he disputed the calculation of overpayment

1 The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. contained in the SSA&s notices, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge&s determination that Terrell was not eligible for benefits based on his family income and that benefits were overpaid to him. See Connell v. Bowen, 888 F.2d 1250, 1251-52 (8th Cir. 1989) (standard of review). Although Terrell argues that the SSA improperly denied his request for a waiver as to the overpayment, we note that the issue of waiver is not properly before us, as the Appeals Council referred this issue back to the SSA, and Terrell alleged neither exhaustion of his administrative remedies on this issue nor a basis for waiver of the exhaustion requirement. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3); Rodabaugh v. Sullivan, 943 F.2d 855, 857 (8th Cir. 1991) (bases for waiver of exhaustion requirement). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Richard Terrell v. Kenneth Apfel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-terrell-v-kenneth-apfel-ca8-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack