Richard T. Wehrle v. Mrs. Oren Brooks
379 F.2d 288, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6843
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. 269 F.Supp. 785.
See, also, Randleman v. Boeres, 93 Cal. App. 745, 270 P. 374 (1928); Thompson v. Taylor, 183 So.2d 16 (Fla.App. 1966); Nicholson v. Roop, 62 N.W.2d 473, 43 A.L.R.2d 1031 (N.D.1954).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard T. Wehrle v. Mrs. Oren Brooks, 379 F.2d 288, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6843 (4th Cir. 1967).
379 F.2d 288 (Richard T. Wehrle v. Mrs. Oren Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Benn v. United States
978 A.2d 1257 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Carr v. F.W. Woolworth Co.
883 F. Supp. 10 (E.D. North Carolina, 1992)
Blue v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.
437 F. Supp. 715 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.
477 F.2d 1116 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
Wilson v. Albuquerque Board of Realtors
472 P.2d 371 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1970)
Johnston v. Cordell National Bank
421 F.2d 1310 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)