Richard T. Keating v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents of the United States
This text of 245 F.2d 279 (Richard T. Keating v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
245 F.2d 279
100 U.S.App.D.C. 346, 113 U.S.P.Q. 504
Richard T. KEATING, Appellant,
v.
Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents of the United
States, Appellee.
Nos. 13612, 13613.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 16, 1957.
Decided June 13, 1957.
[100 U.S.App.D.C. 347] Mr. William E. Lucas, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. William L. Mathis, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. J. Preston Swecker, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellant.
Mr. Joseph Schimmel, Atty., U.S. Patent Office, with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, U.S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee. Mr. H. S. Miller (now deceased), Atty., U.S. Patent Office, also entered an appearance for appellee.
Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These appeals are from the District Court's dismissal of appellant's two suits against the Commissioner of Patents, under 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking issuance of two patents. We agree with the opinion below, D.D.C.1956, 145 F.Supp. 191, that none of the claims define anything inventive over the prior art.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 F.2d 279, 100 U.S. App. D.C. 346, 113 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 504, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-t-keating-v-robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-patents-of-the-cadc-1957.