Richard Stillwell v. Pine Village North Association, Attorney Chris J. Achambault
This text of Richard Stillwell v. Pine Village North Association, Attorney Chris J. Achambault (Richard Stillwell v. Pine Village North Association, Attorney Chris J. Achambault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 10, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00147-CV ——————————— RICHARD STILLWELL A/K/A WILBERT RICHARD STILLWELL, Appellant V. NORTH EAST PINE VILLAGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION D/B/A PINE VILLAGE NORTH ASSOCIATION, Appellee
On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-74522
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Richard Stillwell, also known as Wilbert Richard Stillwell, has
neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See
TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court,
in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on
Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On
March 21, 2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if
appellate costs were not paid, or indigence was not established, by April 20, 2023.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.
Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the
preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On April 12, 2023,
appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did not
submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the
preparation of the clerk’s record by May 12, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
Appellant did not adequately respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Stillwell v. Pine Village North Association, Attorney Chris J. Achambault, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-stillwell-v-pine-village-north-association-attorney-chris-j-texapp-2023.