Richard Steven McClellan v. State
This text of Richard Steven McClellan v. State (Richard Steven McClellan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00147-CR No. 10-14-00148-CR
RICHARD STEVEN MCCLELLAN, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 14,324 and 14,325
ORDER
The appellant’s brief is overdue in these appeals for the second time. The Clerk
of the Court’s January 29, 2015 letter to appellant’s counsel in each cause states that
appellant’s brief was due to be filed on or before January 21, 2015 and that unless a brief
or satisfactory response was received within 14 days, the Court would abate these
causes so that the trial court can hold a hearing to determine why a brief has not been filed on appellant’s behalf and to assure that appellant is receiving effective assistance
of counsel.
Because appellant’s brief was not filed within 14 days and the Court did not
receive a timely satisfactory response in either appeal, we abate these appeals so that
the trial court can conduct any necessary hearings within 21 days of the date of this
order in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2) and (3). TEX. R.
APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3).
The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records required by the rule, if any, are
ordered to be filed within 35 days of the date of this Order. See id.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeals abated Order issued and filed March 5, 2015
McClellan v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Steven McClellan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-steven-mcclellan-v-state-texapp-2015.