Richard Steven Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins and Michael Easton v. Carolyn James

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 2012·No. 01-12-00036-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 2, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00036-CV

———————————

richard steven calkins, individually and as agent-in-fact for mary olive calkins and michael easton, Appellant

V.

carolyn james, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 378993

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1) (providing for voluntary dismissal of a civil case upon appellant’s motion). No opinion has yet issued in this case. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See id. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The clerk is directed to issue mandate within ten days of the date of this opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1.

We dismiss this appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Steven Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins and Michael Easton v. Carolyn James, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Richard Steven Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins and Michael Easton v. Carolyn James (Richard Steven Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact for Mary Olive Calkins and Michael Easton v. Carolyn James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.