Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated
686 F.3d 1121, 2012 WL 3039710, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15379
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2012·No. 10-17755·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be dted as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
*1122 Judges Wardlaw, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated, 686 F.3d 1121, 2012 WL 3039710, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15379 (9th Cir. 2012).
686 F.3d 1121 (Richard Stengel v. Medtronic Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coleman v. Medtronic, Inc.
223 Cal. App. 4th 413 (California Court of Appeal, 2014)