Richard Smith v. Corpus Riversquare I LP
This text of Richard Smith v. Corpus Riversquare I LP (Richard Smith v. Corpus Riversquare I LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00172-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
RICHARD SMITH, Appellant,
v.
CORPUS RIVERSQUARE I LP, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Tijerina, Silva, and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on May 3, 2023. On May 12, 2023, the Clerk of
the Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal was defective and did not comply
with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b), 9.5(e), 25.1(d), and 25.1(e) and that a
$205.00 filing fee was due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 25.1 On June 9, 2023, the Clerk of this Court again notified appellant that the appeal
was subject to dismissal if a filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of the
notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). On July 28, 2023, the Clerk of this Court again
notified appellant of the defects in his notice of appeal; the Clerk of the Court notified
appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the defects were not corrected, or the
filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of receipt of the letter. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
On August 7, 2023, each of the clerk’s notices were returned undeliverable and
marked “return to sender” and “not deliverable as addressed” and “unable to forward.”
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.1(b) requires unrepresented parties to sign
any document filed and “give the party’s mailing address, telephone number, fax number,
if any, and email address.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b). The clerk’s office does not have a
telephone number for appellant, and the district clerk did not have any additional contact
information for the appellant.
Furthermore, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 permits an appellate court,
on its own initiative after giving ten days’ notice to all parties, to dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution or for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules. See
id. 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3.
JAIME TIJERINA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 24th day of August, 2023.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Richard Smith v. Corpus Riversquare I LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-smith-v-corpus-riversquare-i-lp-texapp-2023.