Richard Roy Hart v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 12, 2012·No. 01-10-00510-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 12, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-10-00510-CR ——————————— RICHARD ROY HART, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1247618

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A supplemental clerk’s record complying with our order of abatement has

been filed. Therefore, we order the appeal reinstated.

The supplemental clerk’s record reflects that the trial court granted

appellant’s motion for new trial. The granting of a motion for new trial restores the case to its position before the former trial. See TEX. R. APP P. 21.9(b). No

motion to withdraw the notice of appeal has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

However, the appeal was rendered moot by the order granting a new trial. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Roy Hart v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Richard Roy Hart v. State (Richard Roy Hart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.