Richard Rose v. Mark Collins, Tarik Demby, Lorna Durant, Tracey Helms, Roy Culberson, Tangela Larkin, Percy Larkin, and Linda Larkin
Opinion
Opinion issued February 11, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00542-CV ——————————— RICHARD ROSE, Appellant V. MARK COLLINS, TARIK DEMBY, LORNA DURANT, TRACEY HELMS, ROY CULBERSON, TANGELA LARKIN, PERCY LARKIN, AND LINDA LARKIN, Appellees
On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2006-32092
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Richard Rose, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file
brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary
dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a
brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Richard Rose v. Mark Collins, Tarik Demby, Lorna Durant, Tracey Helms, Roy Culberson, Tangela Larkin, Percy Larkin, and Linda Larkin (Richard Rose v. Mark Collins, Tarik Demby, Lorna Durant, Tracey Helms, Roy Culberson, Tangela Larkin, Percy Larkin, and Linda Larkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.