Richard Rose v. Mark Collins, Tarik Demby, Lorna Durant, Tracey Helms, Roy Culberson, Tangela Larkin, Percy Larkin, and Linda Larkin

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 2014·No. 01-12-00542-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 11, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00542-CV ——————————— RICHARD ROSE, Appellant V. MARK COLLINS, TARIK DEMBY, LORNA DURANT, TRACEY HELMS, ROY CULBERSON, TANGELA LARKIN, PERCY LARKIN, AND LINDA LARKIN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2006-32092

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Richard Rose, has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file

brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary

dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a

brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Rose v. Mark Collins, Tarik Demby, Lorna Durant, Tracey Helms, Roy Culberson, Tangela Larkin, Percy Larkin, and Linda Larkin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Richard Rose v. Mark Collins, Tarik Demby, Lorna Durant, Tracey Helms, Roy Culberson, Tangela Larkin, Percy Larkin, and Linda Larkin (Richard Rose v. Mark Collins, Tarik Demby, Lorna Durant, Tracey Helms, Roy Culberson, Tangela Larkin, Percy Larkin, and Linda Larkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.