Richard Robert Wiltfang v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Richard Robert Wiltfang v. State

DecidedJune 19, 2019

DocketA19A0762

StatusPublished

This text of Richard Robert Wiltfang v. State (Richard Robert Wiltfang v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Robert Wiltfang v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 17, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0762. WILFTANG v. STATE.

The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over “[a]ll cases involving the construction . . . of the Constitution of the State of Georgia or of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1); see Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657-658 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996). Because appellant argues that OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (d.1) (2018) is unconstitutional as it does not require notification that police may obtain a warrant for his blood, it appears that jurisdiction over this appeal may lie in the Supreme Court, despite the fact that the appeal may ultimately be resolved on other grounds. See Harrison v. Wigington, 269 Ga. 388, 388 (497 SE2d 568) (1998) (“If a constitutional question is raised and ruled on below, [the Supreme] [C]ourt has exclusive appellate jurisdiction, and this is true, although upon a consideration of the entire case, [the Supreme] [C]ourt determines that a decision upon such constitutional questions is not necessary to a proper solution of the case, and makes no decision thereon.”) (citation and punctuation omitted).

As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/17/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 17, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0762. WILFTANG v. STATE.

The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over “[a]ll cases involving the construction . . . of the Constitution of the State of Georgia or of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II (1); see Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657, 657-658 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996). Because appellant argues that OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (d.1) (2018) is unconstitutional as it does not require notification that police may obtain a warrant for his blood, it appears that jurisdiction over this appeal may lie in the Supreme Court, despite the fact that the appeal may ultimately be resolved on other grounds. See Harrison v. Wigington, 269 Ga. 388, 388 (497 SE2d 568) (1998) (“If a constitutional question is raised and ruled on below, [the Supreme] [C]ourt has exclusive appellate jurisdiction, and this is true, although upon a consideration of the entire case, [the Supreme] [C]ourt determines that a decision upon such constitutional questions is not necessary to a proper solution of the case, and makes no decision thereon.”) (citation and punctuation omitted).

As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/17/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Richard Robert Wiltfang v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-robert-wiltfang-v-state-gactapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack