RICHARD RINGEL v. CLAUDINE CERMAK

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 11, 2019
Docket19-0022
StatusPublished

This text of RICHARD RINGEL v. CLAUDINE CERMAK (RICHARD RINGEL v. CLAUDINE CERMAK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
RICHARD RINGEL v. CLAUDINE CERMAK, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD RINGEL, Appellant,

v.

CLAUDINE CERMAK, Appellee.

No. 4D19-22

[July 11, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jessica Ticktin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502009DR008782XXXXSB.

Richard Ringel, Boynton Beach, pro se.

Joseph A. Costello of Costello Law, LLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., KUNTZ, J. and BOATWRIGHT, JOE, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
RICHARD RINGEL v. CLAUDINE CERMAK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-ringel-v-claudine-cermak-fladistctapp-2019.