Richard Randal Springer v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Richard Randal Springer v. State

DecidedNovember 19, 2008

Docket12-08-00441-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Richard Randal Springer v. State (Richard Randal Springer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Richard Randal Springer v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-08-00441-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD RANDALL SPRINGER,

§ APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V.

§ JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§ SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance in a drug free zone. The trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for three years. We have received the trial court's certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel and includes the notice, as required by rule 25.2, that Appellant has been informed of his rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered November 19, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-08-00441-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RICHARD RANDALL SPRINGER,

§ APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V.

§ JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§ SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance in a drug free zone. The trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for three years. We have received the trial court's certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel and includes the notice, as required by rule 25.2, that Appellant has been informed of his rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered November 19, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Richard Randal Springer v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richard-randal-springer-v-state-texapp-2008.